In this article, I will give insights into why Donald Trump seems to have an issue with the Smithsonian now.
This dispute arises out of the competing perspectives on America’s history, especially with regard to race relations and slavery.
Trump’s critique of the institution is part of a greater worry over the political slant given to culture and history.
The Reasons Donald Trump Started Disliking The Smithsonian
Throughout his public life, President Donald Trump has attracted controversy for a multitude of reasons. More recently, he has opposed government institutions, including the Smithsonian.

Most people regard the Smithsonian as a point of pride for the country since it houses American culture, history, and milestones in the form of museums and research centers. However, it begs the question why Trump, someone who previously favored the institution, is now constantly clashing with it.
The Smithsonian’s Importance in American Culture
As an American agglomeration of world class museums and research centers, The Smithsonian Institution is known housing the most important cultural and historical American artifacts.
Along with the 19 USS museums, they have an additional 21 libraries and a zoo, which makes The Smithsonian one of the most visited places in the world, with millions of people flocking to it every year.
The openly stated goal of The Smithsonian, to foster the advancement of knowledge and education as well as safeguarding historical pieces, serves as the backbone of how America, and the world, views the country’s past國.
While in office, Trump made it a point to appreciate the United States as fundamentally unique in the world. He celebrated American history as the backbone for such exceptionalism and aligned himself with institutions like the Smithsonian which sought to preserve and promote it.
Trump, while in office and after, developed a sour relationship with the institution, particularly because of the Smithsonian’s own interpretation of history and cultural representation which, over time, began to not align with Trump’s political views.
The Unraveling of the Situation
The main problem Trump had with the Smithsonian is their approach to history, culture, and identity. There has particularly been a clash on how history should be captured and shown to the people in relation to slavery, racial inequality, and the founding of the country.
The Trump administration has almost always tried to brush aside or completely ignored discussions about American history and the brutal truths which accompany it.
The Smithsonian, on the other hand, seems to counter these efforts through exhibits, research programs, and other initiatives that attempt to grapple with the difficult realities of America’s past.
In 2020, Trump had a public dispute with the Smithsonian over the “National Museum of African American History and Culture” (NMAAHC) during the final year of his presidency.
The museum’s exhibit on race and racism, which examined systemic issues involving the history of slavery and segregation, drew the ire of Trump and many of his supporters because of how it portrayed American history.
The controversy commenced when the museum’s assets, inclusive of a guide on how to talk about racism and privilege, came under right-wing backlash.
Trump’s rhetoric that sought to minimize or rewrite historical injustices, collided sharply with the Smithsonian’s policy of confronting difficult realities about race and discrimination in America.
For Trump and his base, the Smithsonian’s attempts did nothing but solidify partisan and politically motivated divisions. Many other people, however, found those same efforts essential to grappling with nuanced understandings of national history.
The Smithsonian’s Response
Amidst Trump’s lash outs at the Smithsonian, the institution remained focused on incorporating African American history as well as Native American culture into their exhibits. They were inclined towards marginalized groups and ethnic minorities that have been sidelined in American history too.
The Smithsonian is also taking steps toward addressing some contemporary issues like racial injustice and inequality, considering their significance in conversations nationwide – especially after the Black Lives Matter movement.
He institution also addressed some of the criticisms surrounding the Smithsonian itself. They attempted to resolve issues in 2020, when it became public knowledge that the Smithsonian was aware of its association with slavery and racial discrimination in the form of exclusion policies.
Some of their earliest board members and donors belonging to slave owning families meant they ignored some history. Facing this kind of institutional scrutiny is what deepened the Trump-Smithsonian divide, as these ex-presidents made it a point to avoid introspection – and often characterize it as “radical” leftist thinking.
Trump’s Critique on “Left-Wing” Bias
Trump’s reservations on the Smithsonian go beyond the portrayal of history and include peripheral political biases that the institution allegedly embraces.
While serving as the President of the United States, he ceaselessly cajoled cultural institutions like museums, the media, and academic institutions for what he contended to be “leftward” or “liberal” bias.
The Smithsonian, which is a federally funded (tax dollars) institution controlled by the U.S government, is one of many institutions that he felt was losing its neutrality due to overhand cynicism toward the right and conservatism, and succumbing to progressive narrative.

For some reason, Trump and his supporters went verboard with bringing culture wars to schools. They went as far as to impose travel bans to disallow certain educators from attending conferences, such as the one hosted by the National Council of Teachers of English, if they were deemed ‘too liberal’ .
In addition, Trump’s administration sought to impose budget cuts and slash funding to certain cultural programs underfunded. They based their arguments on the premise that these programs were unnecessary or overtly political and did not align with their conservative worldview.
This clash intensified as the Smithsonian embraced social justice, diversity, and inclusion initiatives which, to those in Trump’s sphere, were politically charged decisions.
The Larger Cultural War
This dispute between Trump and the Smithsonian is a snapshot of much deeper culture conflict in America – one which tears apart traditional and conservative values.
On one hand, the more conservative side of Trump’s supporters push for a raw and unrestrained version of American history, featuring extreme levels of patriotism and nationalism.
On the other hand, Trump’s critics argue such narrative goes too far by glossing over the nation’s shameful history and curing it’s ability to move forward only by understanding its shortcomings.
For Trump, the Smithsonian’s willingness to confront uncomfortable truths was a problem, but for many others, it was always and will remain a much needed step toward a more honest reckoning with the nation’s past.
In the end, the conflict with the Smithsonian embodies the greater conflict of what America wants to remember itself as, a land of unapparelled triumph and exceptionalism, or a place that strives to acknowledge the injustices and failures along the journey.
Conclusion
Even though President Donald Trump has commended the Smithsonian for its American history exhibitions, the institution’s changing approach to race and culture has put him in opposition to its mission.
The conflict with Trump embodies the cultural warfare that continues to shape the identity of America as the Smithsonian strives to present the nation’s history as multifaceted and often contradictory.
It is certain that in the name of patriotism these political figures will attempt to dispute the factually grounded narrative that will be set forth, however, it is precisely such attempts which will ensure that this country’s youth will know what it truly means to be an American.