10 Best Compliance Evidence Collection Software For 2026

In this article I will talk about the Best Compliance Evidence Collection Software. For organizations to automate the collection of evidence, streamline audits, and sustain ongoing compliance, choosing the appropriate software is crucial.

The growing intricacy of frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA makes these tools important for minimizing manual effort, improving accuracy, and increasing visibility into your compliance status.

Key Points & Best Software For Compliance Evidence Collection

Software	Key Point
Drata	Automates SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA compliance with continuous monitoring
Vanta	Streamlines evidence collection with integrations across cloud services
Secureframe	Provides audit-ready compliance workflows for SOC 2 and ISO
LogicGate Risk Cloud	Flexible GRC platform with customizable evidence tracking
Hyperproof	Centralized repository for compliance evidence and task management
AuditBoard	Enterprise-grade compliance automation with audit trail visibility
Tugboat Logic	Guided compliance templates and automated evidence collection
Scrut Automation	Focuses on continuous compliance monitoring for cloud-native firms
Crosstrax	Evidence management system designed for investigators and audits
Risk Cloud by LogicGate	Supports multiple frameworks with scalable compliance workflows

10 Best Software For Compliance Evidence Collection

1. Drata

Drata streamlines automation for SOC 2 compliance, ISO 27001, and additional compliance frameworks through the use of automated compliance evidence collection.

It integrates with your tech stack and automates the gathering of your users’ activities, logs, configurations, and access permissions to monitor security controls continuously.

Drata’s dashboard displays compliance status in real time, and its manual work reduction features improve audit readiness.

Compliance workflows, alerting, and intuitive systems enhance external audit confidence and reduce compliance risk for teams.

Drata Features

• Automated Evidence Collection: Work remains entirely hands-off as the automated evidence collection feature continues to gather logs, configurations, plus control evidence from integrated systems (cloud, identity, infra).
• Real-Time Compliance Dashboard: No need to waste time looking for the status of compliance metrics as the control health dashboard updates in real-time.
• Pre-Built Framework Support: Users can utilize the integrated framework templates that support SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and others.
• Alerting & Remediation: Teams are alerted of evidence that is missing, plus, the tool describes what steps can be taken to fill this gap.

Pros	Cons
Automates evidence collection from many integrations like cloud services and identity providers.	Pricing can be expensive for small teams or startups.
Real-time compliance monitoring reduces manual work and accelerates audits.	Some advanced workflows require support to configure.
User-friendly interface and dashboards make compliance visibility easy.	Less customizable for unusual or highly specific frameworks.

2. Vanta

Vanta simplifies the process of gathering evidence for compliance by monitoring security controls on various platforms, including AWS, GitHub, GCP, Okta, etc.

It tracks access logs, user roles, and the security settings of different systems and creates an audit trail automatically, without the need for any manual work.

Vanta helps its users get ready for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and a variety of other frameworks, by continuously generating evidence, identifying evidence gaps, and providing users with remediation recommendations.

Auditors tend to favor the speed and efficiency of audits on the transparency and completeness of evidence.

Vanta Features

• Automated Evidence Collection: Evidence is collected without semantic collaboration as it runs audits to ascertain if there is compliant behavior in the control systems and the surrounding infrastructure.
• Integration Ecosystem: Evidence can be collected from various platforms (e.g. AWS, Google Cloud, GitHub, and Okta).
• Risk & Gap Visibility: control and compliance automation solutions with the highest risk gaps offset reward traceable path(s) for overcoming control gaps.
• Audit-Ready Reports: Collecting evidence is simple as the system can be configured to collect notes and evidence that are aligned to the requirements of the auditors.

Pros	Cons
Comprehensive automated control tracking across key platforms.	Can feel rigid for non-standard processes.
Continuous monitoring and alerts for compliance gaps.	Some analytics features require additional configuration.
Strong support for SOC 2, ISO 27001 and other frameworks.	UI may feel basic compared to enterprise GRC suites.

3. Secureframe

Secureframe supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and other standards through automating compliance workflows and evidence collection.

It connects with cloud services, identity providers, and security tools to automatically collect user activity logs, policy attestations, and risk assessments.

Secureframe provides a dashboard to visualize compliance status, monitor control effectiveness, and track evidence collection.

Secureframe helps organizations manage ongoing compliance with less effort and improves interactions with auditors by using preconfigured templates and minimizing the work security teams must do.

Secureframe Features

• Automatic Evidence Collection: Collects user activity logs, policy sign-offs, and access data from systems.
• Compliance Templates: Frameworks and templates to help define control requirements.
• Dashboard Insights: Provides real-time status of compliance and unfulfilled evidence.
• Task Remediation Workflows: Assigns and tracks tasks, providing actionable suggestions.

Pros	Cons
Automates evidence collection from security and identity systems.	Initial setup and implementation can be time-intensive.
Has built-in templates for common frameworks.	Advanced reports and dashboards may need customization.
Dashboards give clear compliance posture insights.	Best suited for standard frameworks; less flexible for unique needs.

4. LogicGate Risk Cloud

LogicGate Risk Cloud is a GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) Solution that is designed for automation regarding the collection of evidence and completion of assessments for risks across various frameworks.

It centralizes each of the policies, the controls, and the evidence, and it gives its users the ability to customize their environments to enable automated workflows and data collection from integrated systems.

Users are able to monitor the effectiveness of the controls, create audit histories, and distribute remediation responsibilities.

Through the no-code design, users of LogicGate are able to monitor gaps within regulatory compliance, enhance collaboration across various work groups, and maintain a continuous status overview of risks and evidence.

LogicGate Risk Cloud Features

• No-Code Workflow Builder: Tailor compliance and risk workflows without the need for programming.
• Centralized Control Repository: Keeps policies, controls, and proof in one unified location.
• Automated Evidence Ties: Associates collected evidence to specific controls and risks.
• Risk & Compliance Mapping: Efficiently maps controls to various frameworks for multiple uses.

Pros	Cons
Highly customizable no-code platform for risk and compliance workflows.	Steeper learning curve for new users.
Centralizes controls, policies, and evidence in one place.	Cost can be high for smaller organizations.
Flexible for complex compliance and enterprise risk needs.	Requires skilled admin to configure advanced workflows.

5. Hyperproof

Hyperproof streamlines compliance operations by automating three core processes: collecting evidence, tracking evidence, and testing controls for frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR. After integrating with an organization’s security and identity systems

Hyperproof automates capture of relevant logs, policy attestations, and configuration data to remove the burden of manual evidence collection.

Hyperproof organizes, controls, and packages the data to show audit-ready evidence. The platform’s unambiguous real-time data and consolidated dashboards enable compliance teams to optimize their workflows and confidently showcase control implementations to auditors.

Hyperproof Features

• Evidence Correlation: Relates unprocessed evidence to specific control requirements for unambiguous traceability.
• Framework Library: Provides support for various frameworks including SOC 2, ISO, GDPR, etc.
• Automated Data Ingestion: Collects and integrates logs and configuration changes from connected systems.
• Audit Packaging: Rapidly creates organized packages of evidence for auditors.

Pros	Cons
Strong automation of evidence collection and control testing.	Some integrations require technical setup.
Provides clear links between controls and collected evidence.	Can be complex for users new to GRC tools.
Good reporting and audit preparation features.	Smaller ecosystem of add-ons compared to major competitors.

6. AuditBoard

AuditBoard is a risk management, auditing, and compliance solution that simplifies tracking and organizing evidence for internal and external audits.

It integrates with various systems to automate log and control documentation collection, minimizing manual work for compliance teams.

AuditBoard automates the workflows to assess evidence, monitors the responses, and confirms that the required documentation and testing have been completed.

AuditBoard demonstrates evidence in a format that is ready for audits and helps in the management of documentation and compliance for frameworks like SOX, SOC, and ISO. It provides analytics to management and other stakeholders.

AuditBoard Features

• End-to-End Audit Support: Integrates evidence gathering, testing, reporting, and audit workflows.
• SOX & Risk Integration: Robust functionality for SOX, internal audit, risk, and control frameworks.
• Document & Evidence Management: Consolidated repository for policies, evidence, and test artifacts.
• Dashboards & Analytics: Executive dashboards and analytics tools improve visibility and support better decision-making.

Pros	Cons
Comprehensive platform supporting audits, risks, and compliance.	Primarily enterprise-focused; expensive for small teams.
Excellent documentation and evidence reporting.	Heavyweight for teams only needing evidence collection.
Streamlines workflows for internal audits and compliance controls.	Customization options can be overwhelming.

7. Tugboat Logic

Tugboat Logic offers an automated platform for compliance and risk management which streamlines control testing and evidence collection.

It integrates with cloud applications, identity management tools, and security solutions to automatically retrieve user activity data, configuration snapshots, and access logs.

For each piece of evidence, Tugboat Logic associates evidence to applicable controls for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and other compliance frameworks and offers remediation and gap analysis.

With minimal manual work, compliance teams can monitor compliance status and update security and compliance posture through central dashboards, which also allow teams to streamline audit package creation.

Tugboat Logic Features

• Automated Control Testing: Performs continual testing of security controls through direct system integrations.
• Gap & Risk Assessment: Recognizes deficiencies and prioritizes them for corrective action.
• Audit Evidence Packages: Automatically generates the required documentation and logs for audits.
• Framework Coverage: Pre-configured support for SOC 2, ISO, PCI, and more.

Pros	Cons
Good automated evidence gathering from connected systems.	Smaller integration library than some top competitors.
Provides gap analysis and remediation guidance.	UI/UX can feel less intuitive.
Helps generate audit-ready evidence packages.	Reporting features may lack advanced capabilities.

8. Scrut Automation

Scrut Automation specializes in the streamlining of collecting evidence for compliance by automating the collection and analysis of data.

It works with data management, identity tools, and security partitions to obtain logs, snapshot configurations, and access transactions related to compliance frameworks.

Scrut organizes the data, correlates the data with compliance controls, and identifies missing evidence and gaps in compliance.

The continuous collection of data is preempted by automated scheduling and alerts, meaning security teams have to do less work. This strategy enhances the organization’s audit readiness and ensures reliable record trails.

Scrut Automation Features

• Continuous Evidence Capture: Auto captures logs, configurations, and identity-related data.
• Compliance Gap Alerts: Proactively identifies missing evidence or control breakdowns.
• Integration with Infra Stack: Integrates with your cloud, directory, and security tools.
• Simplified Evidence Dashboard: Easy overview of evidence captured and evidence gaps.

Pros	Cons
Focuses on continuous, automated evidence collection.	Newer or less mature platform compared to large vendors.
Highlights compliance gaps with alerts.	Limited framework support relative to bigger tools.
Simplifies infrastructure-level evidence capture.	Fewer built-in audit workflow tools beyond evidence collection.

9. Crosstrax

Crosstrax is a compliance orchestration tool that collects and manages evidence from various frameworks. With compliance integrations from IT and security systems, user activity records, policy attestations, and control metrics are captured automatically.

Crosstrax integrates various frameworks and manages evidence from IT and security systems. He centralizes evidence and compliance status tracking, making audits preps easier.

Crosstrax automates workflows and provides customizable dashboards which helps teams visualize control gaps and assign tasks. Crosstrax boosts transparency and collaboration throughout the compliance program.

Crosstrax Features

• Compliance Orchestration: Streamlines evidence collection workflows across all stakeholders.
• Custom Dashboards: Create dashboards in alignment with your compliance initiatives.
• Control & Evidence Mapping: Connects collected artifacts to specific control requirements.
• Scalable for Frameworks: Addresses multiple frameworks and diverse compliance requirements.

Pros	Cons
Centralizes compliance orchestration for controls and evidence.	Smaller ecosystem of integrations.
Customizable dashboards and workflows.	Setup may require technical support.
Good choice for multi-framework environments.	Documentation may be limited for advanced features.

10. Risk Cloud by LogicGate

LogicGate Risk Cloud offers a GRC platform with no-code automation for the collection of compliance evidence and management of risks.

It integrates the automation of data pulls from integrated systems with controls, policies, and evidence, thus minimizing the need for data collection manually. Users design custom workflows to address evidence requests, manage exceptions, and record control testing.

Risk Cloud applies reporting to provide extensive views of compliance posture and ease audits. Risk Cloud’s adaptability to different frameworks offers teams the ability to support sustaining ongoing visibility to risks and evidence throughout the organization.

Risk Cloud by LogicGate Features

• Unified Risk & Evidence Platform: Integrates evidence, controls, risk rating, and workflows.
• No-Code Customization: Create compliance workflows tailored to your needs without coding.
• Automated Evidence Correlation: Auto associates evidence to relevant controls and risks.
• Compliance Reporting: Prepares compliance views and reports for audits.

Pros	Cons
No-code customization of risk and compliance processes.	Complex platform that can require skilled administrators.
Strong automation and linking of evidence to risk and controls.	Feels heavyweight for simple evidence collection needs.
Unified compliance posture view and reporting.	Enterprise pricing limits accessibility for smaller teams.

How To Choose The Best Compliance Evidence Collection Software

• Identify Compliance Requirements Determine your compliance needs (e.g., SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA) and evaluate if the software meets those requirements.
• Automation Select software with the least amount of manual work needed from your team.
• Integration Assess if the software integrates with your existing technology (cloud services, identity management, security).
• Customization and Growth Potential Assess the vendor’s ability to accommodate future growth and the customization of evidence collection workflow.
• Evidence Reports Evaluate the software’s ability to generate evidence reports and evidence for audit readiness.
• User Experience Evaluate the user experience, and the intuitiveness of the system.
• Security Evaluate the platform’s access controls, audit logs, and encryption.
• Value Evaluate the pricing and the value of the software relative to your team’s size and desired features.
• Documentation and Support Find a vendor with a knowledge base, good customer support, and user forums.

Conclusion

Finally, selecting best compliance evidence collection software is important for optimizing audit preparation and sustaining regulatory compliance.

These software solutions streamline evidence collection, minimize human error, and improve visibility into the effectiveness of controls.

Organizations can save time, increase evidence collection accuracy, and maintain audit readiness by choosing a solution that meets their different needs for frameworks, integrations, and workflow.

FAQ