In this article, I will discuss the best DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) projects to watch in 2025. As the DePIN space evolves
several projects are emerging with innovative solutions that promise to reshape industries like connectivity, energy, and storage. I’ll highlight key factors to consider when choosing the top DePIN projects for the upcoming year.
Key Points & Best Depin Project In 2025
| Project | Ticker | Focus Area | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Internet Computer | ICP | Decentralized Computing | Scalable smart contracts and dApps with Web-speed performance |
| Bittensor | TAO | Decentralized AI Network | Decentralized training of machine learning models |
| Render | RENDER | Decentralized Cloud Rendering | Offers decentralized GPU-based cloud rendering |
| Filecoin | FIL | Decentralized Storage | A peer-to-peer storage network for storing and sharing data |
| Shieldeum | SDM | Security & Privacy | Privacy-focused blockchain with encrypted transactions |
| The Graph | GRT | Data Indexing for Blockchain | Decentralized indexing protocol for blockchain data |
| Theta Network | THETA | Video Streaming | Blockchain-based decentralized video delivery and streaming |
| Arweave | AR | Decentralized Permanent Storage | Permanent and immutable storage for decentralized applications |
| Helium | HNT | Decentralized Wireless Network | A decentralized network for IoT devices using blockchain and wireless tech |
| Soarchain | – | Decentralized Cloud Infrastructure | Decentralized cloud services with a focus on data privacy and security |
| Silencio | – | Decentralized Social Network | Privacy-preserving social media with decentralized architecture |
| Hivemapper | HONEY | Decentralized Mapping | Community-driven mapping and 3D visualization of geographical data |
| BlockDAG | – | Distributed Ledger Technology | Alternative to blockchain with higher scalability and speed |
| Livepeer | LPT | Video Infrastructure | Decentralized live video streaming and encoding services |
| Audius | AUDIO | Music Streaming | Decentralized music streaming platform that bypasses traditional intermediaries |
| StromDAO | STRO | Decentralized Energy Trading | A decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) for energy trading |
| Teller Protocol | TLR | Decentralized Credit and Lending | Credit scoring and lending protocol for decentralized finance (DeFi) |
| Chainlink | LINK | Oracle Network | Decentralized oracle network to connect smart contracts to real-world data |
| Celo | CELO | Mobile Payments & DeFi | A mobile-first decentralized platform focusing on financial inclusion |
| Filebase | FBASE | Decentralized Storage | Decentralized storage service built on top of IPFS and Sia |
20 Best Depin Project In 2025
1.Internet Computer (ICP)
According to industry predictions, the Internet Computer ecosystem will likely witness increased activity in decentralized finance (DeFi) and decentralized applications (dApps).
Major projects will built on scaling decentralized networks, improving User Experience, and ensuring secure, fast transactions. Going forward cues in decentralized identity and web 3 zero, and cross chain inteoperacy in this regard will form The Internet Computer’s major thrust in theand in the development of decentralized finance.
Pros And Cons Internet Computer (ICP)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Scalable blockchain with high throughput. | Complex architecture and governance model. |
| Low transaction fees compared to traditional blockchains. | Limited adoption compared to other major platforms. |
| Supports smart contracts and dApps at a web speed. | Requires a steep learning curve for developers. |
| Decentralized data storage with improved security. | Potential centralization risks with node operators. |
| Strong backing and development from DFINITY Foundation. | Network upgrades and changes may cause instability. |
2.Bittensor (TAO)
By 2025 Bittensor (TAO) will change the landscape of how AI is decentralized in its very essence by encouraging the contributors on its p2p network to build and train ML models.
Other DePIN projects will employ Its proof of intelligence model to develop And spun out AI based models, encouraging shared data, new ways of AI tools, thriving inter-industry collaborative intelligence ecosystem.
Pros And Cons Bittensor (TAO)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Scalable network supporting large datasets. | Competition with established AI models and networks. |
| Promotes collaboration between AI developers. | Dependence on network participation for model performance. |
| Robust tokenomics rewarding participants. | Initial scalability and adoption challenges. |
3.Render (RENDER)
In 2025, the Render (RENDER) decentralized GPU rendering will transform the process of creating digital content. The leading DePIN projects will utilize Render’s network for inexpensive 3D modeling towards the relief of such industries as gaming, metaverse development, and visual effects.
Render will secure the cultural production by enabling the global access to GPU, thus improving creativity, workflow efficiency, and innovative activities in decentralized content creation.
Pros And Cons Render (RENDER)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Decentralized rendering network reduces costs. | Requires high computational power from users. |
| Access to a global network of render nodes. | Potential difficulty in onboarding new users. |
| Supports a wide range of industries, including film and animation. | Market competition with traditional centralized render farms. |
4.Filecoin (FIL)
Innovations in decentralized storage will be driven by Filecoin (FIL) in the year 2025, as they will be the ones who hopefully provide support towards the active projects for DePIN, which maintains and processes information in light of a closed-loop supply chain on a global scale.
The major Web 3.0 initiatives for dApps, NFTs and enterprises have more affordable and more scalable economical storage solutions. As the accessibility of information retrievals increases, so shall interoperabilty, and so too will Filecoin facilitate decentralized data control, whilst also transforming the dependability of digital infrastructure.
Pros And Cons Filecoin (FIL)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Decentralized storage network with enhanced security. | High storage and retrieval costs in some cases. |
| Supports a wide range of decentralized applications (dApps). | Requires technical expertise to set up storage nodes. |
| Large ecosystem and strong community support. | Limited storage capacity compared to centralized providers. |
5.Shieldeum (SDM)
Shieldeum (SDM) is one of the most exciting DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network) projects to keep up with in 2025. Aiming at achieving Web3 security, Shieldeum employs the most advanced decentralized technology in order to safeguard their users’ information and their assets.
The combination of its encrypted private networks, bare-metal server infrastructure and AI security makes a strong combination. Using the SDM token, users can stake and obtain network services, thus enhancing the practicality and effectiveness of the network.
Pros And Cons Shieldeum (SDM)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Provides secure, decentralized infrastructure for Web3. | Still in early stages, with a need for broader adoption. |
| Uses professional-grade data center servers, ensuring reliability and performance. | Requires high staking (100,000 SDM tokens per node) for participation. |
| Aims to become a leader in decentralized cybersecurity, catering to growing crypto security needs. | Heavy reliance on node operators could limit decentralization. |
| Facilitates seamless and cost-effective security solutions for crypto holders. | Current market volatility may impact token value and growth. |
| Built for scalability, with intuitive services that ensure crypto asset protection. | Technical complexity might deter less experienced users from joining. |
6.The Graph (GRT)
In 2025, The Graph (GRT) has been recognized as one of the leading DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network) projects. It allows the dApps to easily make use of decentralized search and index operations of the blockchain data.
Known as “the Google of blockchains”, it packages data into “subgraphs” so that data can be reconstructed easily and in an organized manner so as to enhance efficiency as well as accountability in Web 3.0 ecosystems. The GRT tokens act as bounties that reward contributors to the system further adding to its strong decentralized structure
Pros And Cons The Graph (GRT)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Decentralized indexing of blockchain data via GraphQL. | Currently still somewhat centralized in its governance. |
| Supports multiple blockchains like Ethereum, IPFS, and Solana. | High technical barrier for developers, requiring knowledge of WebAssembly. |
| Offers a unique service for DeFi platforms and Web3 projects. | Limited adoption in comparison to more established protocols. |
| GRT token is used for transaction fees, incentivizing participation. | Market cap is relatively low compared to other large tokens. |
| Community-driven, with users rewarded for contributing to indexing and curation. | GRT’s long-term stability and value are uncertain. |
7.Theta Network (THETA)
Theta Network (THETA) emerges as a frontrunner in the DePIN project for 2025 as it aims to focus on decentralizing content delivery and edge computing infrastructure aimed at revolutionizing video streaming, AI, and entertainment markets. By allowing services such as Netflix and YouTube to cut their expenses by means of decentralized storage and streaming
Theta integrates its Edge Network with blockchain for effective data management, governance, and staking. It’s a strong ecosystem and partnerships with key media companies, which makes it one of the most important participants of the Web3 ushering
Pros And Cons Theta Network (THETA)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Decentralization: Theta is built on Ethereum, promoting a decentralized video distribution systemcrypto.news. | Complexity: The advanced technology may be difficult for some users to understandCryptiqo. |
| Incentivization: Users earn tokens by sharing computational and bandwidth resourcesCryptiqo. | Reliance on Ethereum: Any issues with Ethereum can affect ThetaCryptiqo. |
| Scalability: Theta enhances streaming speed and reduces bufferingCryptiqocrypto.news. | Volatility: The cryptocurrency market’s volatility affects token valueCryptiqo. |
8.Arweave (AR)
Arweave (AR), thanks to its new approach to decentralized and ever-evolving data archival documentation, surpasses every DePIN project as of 2025. Arweaves’s “blockweave” architecture guarantees efficient storage that cannot be altered, and the Guaranteed Succinct Proof of Random Access (SPoRA) consensus ensures its protection.
The People may store data permanently by making a one-off payment in AR tokens. This seems to be a reasonably priced option, given the censorship-resistant features of the service. This ability can be valuable for archival of important and useful information including historical, cultural and Web3 application data
Pros And Cons Arweave (AR)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Provides permanent, immutable data storage | Faces scalability concerns as demand grows |
| Ideal for decentralized web applications | Competition from other storage solutions like Filecoin and StorjCoin Kickoff |
| Uses unique proof-of-access consensus mechanism | High reliance on the AR token’s market price for sustainabilityCoin Kickoffcrypto.news |
9.Helium (HNT)
Helium (HNT) is poised to be a leading DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network) project in 2025 due to its innovative approach to IoT and 5G network expansion.
Through its decentralized ecosystem, Helium allows users to deploy hotspots and earn tokens for providing long-range, low-power IoT connectivity and 5G mobile services.
Its Proof-of-Coverage system ensures efficient network growth while rewarding participants. Additionally, partnerships with major telecom providers like T-Mobile enhance scalability and accessibility.
Pros And Cons Helium (HNT)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Low Entry Cost: Helium miners are relatively affordable and energy-efficient. | Reduced Profitability: As more miners join, individual rewards decrease. |
| Decentralized Wireless Network: It enables the creation of a global wireless network for IoT devices. | Declining Token Value: HNT’s value has stagnated, which impacts mining profitability. |
| Passive Income: Once set up, miners can generate passive income with minimal effort. | Maintenance Required: To optimize earnings, ongoing effort is needed to adjust setups (e.g., antenna). |
10.Soarchain
Soarchain is emerging as a standout DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network) project in 2025, revolutionizing the mobility sector. Built on the Solana blockchain, it enables real-time, secure data sharing between vehicles and the mobility ecosystem.
Soarchain empowers users to monetize vehicle-generated data, offering services like dynamic insurance and predictive maintenance, fostering decentralized innovation in transportation
Pros And Cons Soarchain
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Secure Data Sharing: Soarchain enables secure, real-time data sharing between vehicles, enhancing safety and efficiency. | Dependence on Devices: Requires Soarchain devices to be installed in vehicles, which may not be universally adopted. |
| Rewards for Participation: Users earn rewards for sharing valuable vehicle data, incentivizing participation in the ecosystem. | Limited Adoption: Adoption might be slow, especially in regions with low interest in blockchain-based mobility solutions. |
| Universal Compatibility: Soarchain devices work with any vehicle model, promoting broader accessibility. | Privacy Concerns: Despite secure data sharing, some users may be wary about the continuous tracking of their vehicle’s data. |
11.Silencio
Silencio is touted to take the spotlight in DAP projects in 2025. It helps users worldwide to record and share the noise pollution in their area via smartphone apps, making it possible to create noise maps of various urban areas.
Silencio, which has more than 300,000 users worldwide, rewards its users for taking part with NOISE Coin, and has plans for the SLC token to be launched.
It has possible uses in urban design and real estate assessments, so it is the first of its kind combining citizen science and crowdsourced data collection
Pros And Cons Silencio
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Allows users to earn tokens for collecting noise data. | Requires active participation from users to collect meaningful data. |
| Provides valuable noise pollution data to industries like real estate and urban planning. | Data quality may vary depending on user contribution. |
| Enables privacy with anonymized data ownership. | The app may not appeal to all users due to its niche focus on noise pollution. |
| Provides a decentralized noise data marketplace for research and decision-making. | Relies heavily on smartphone sensors, limiting accessibility. |
| Supports global engagement with a growing community. | Network expansion may be hindered by geographical limitations. |
12.Hivemapper
Hivemapper is a unique decentralized mapping project that has the potential to expand significantly in 2025. It enables users to create maps of the world and earns HONEY tokens from the group by recording street-level images through dashcams.
The Hivemapper network is a cost-effective and transparent solution to the services offered by Google Maps and similar providers, with the added features of updates in real-time and AI improvements
Pros And Cons Hivemapper
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Decentralized map ownership and control | Early rewards are low, making it less attractive for non-urban drivers |
| Contributors earn tokens (HONEY) for mapping areas | Requires driving and capturing quality footage, which may not always be feasible |
| Potential for high rewards in rapidly developing regions | Earnings depend heavily on location and vehicle efficiency |
13.BlockDAG
BlockDAG is expected to be one of the top projects in the decentralized space by 2025 thanks to its innovative architecture that combines the scaling of DAG with the security of conventional blockchain.
Scalability enables BlockDAG to achieve faster, cheaper, more efficient and secure transactions, supporting up to 15,000 transactions per second.
Due to its unique architecture, BlockDAGS is attracting a lot of attention and massive funding even in its presale stage which has raised millions of dollars.
Combine this with the hype around the potential of the innovation to disrupt decentralized applications and blockchain technology and it’s easy to understand why investors are excited
Pros And Cons BlockDAG
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| High Scalability: Processes multiple blocks at once, improving throughput | Complexity: The concept of BlockDAG can be difficult for new users to grasp |
| Lower Transaction Fees: Reduces overhead for cheaper transactions | Centralization Risk: Mining rewards may centralize if only a few miners participate |
| Eco-Friendly: More energy-efficient than traditional blockchains like Bitcoin | Market Volatility: High rewards could lead to price fluctuations if too many miners join |
14.Livepeer (LPT)
In the upcoming 2025, Livepeer (LPT) can be noted as one of the prominent DePIN projects for transforming the video streaming architecture.
With regards to on-demand transcoding of video content, Livepeer is one of the most appealing options for developers as it transmits the need for video solutions at much lower costs than conventional providers.
Video clip rewriting services cost less through P2P Livepeer protocols since users are rewarded with LPT tokens for sharing their devices’ computing power with Livepeer, thus promoting much cheaper, faster and more efficient video services
Pros And Cons Livepeer (LPT)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Decentralized video streaming reduces reliance on centralized services | Technical setup and usage complexity may deter non-technical users |
| Cost-effective, leveraging underutilized computing resources for video transcoding | Faces stiff competition from established providers like AWS |
| Scalable network can handle high-volume streams with efficiency | Adoption is still growing; convincing developers and users to shift is challenging |
15.Audius (AUDIO)
The expert observers predict that by the year 2025, AUDIO will grow into a leading player on the development of decentralized music streaming. Their estimate and predictions are based on the fact that Audius offers artists finer control and more direct engagement with their fans.
Is Audius successful in adopting integrations like NFTs and all the partnerships including Cloudflare and TikTok collaborations, then it will become one of the major players within the changing music industry
The users of the service appreciate its decentralized architecture that has been constructed on Ethereum and Solana because the application of such technology would probably change the industry of music streaming forever.
Pros And Cons Audius (AUDIO)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Allows artists to directly connect with fans. | Still a relatively new project with risks. |
| Offers artists the ability to monetize music through token staking. | Security concerns due to decentralization. |
| Growing community and integration with platforms like TikTok. | Volatility in token value and unclear long-term pricing trends. |
| Offers governance rights through staking AUDIO tokens. | Limited awareness compared to major competitors like Spotify. |
| No middlemen, leading to fairer revenue distribution for artists. | The future of its token remains uncertain. |
16.StromDAO (STRO)
Ahos StromDAO (STRO) is the great DePIN project for 2025 where it is centered towards building decentralized energy infrastructure.
It allows users to produce, save, and distribute renewable energy using blockchain technology by ensuring that transactions and energy sharing are done in a mutually agreed and understood way.
StromDAO seeks to stimulate energy clean energy creation by tokenizing its fast-growing user base and providing STRO tokens in the place of normal payments which makes it a major player in decentralized power solutions and sustainability
Pros And Cons StromDAO (STRO)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Provides decentralized control of energy resources. | Requires significant technical knowledge to operate effectively |
| Promotes cost efficiency through community-driven resources and rewards | Faces challenges with market adoption and user engagement |
| Supports scalability by leveraging community resources to expand energy grid capacity | Vulnerable to network security threats, necessitating robust safety measures |
17.Teller Protocol (TLR)
Teller Protocol (TLR) has proven to be a revolutionary invention and a foremost DeFi project, primarily in the autonomous lending and credit markets in 2025.
It allows granting of time bound, blankets loan without the need for a margin call which serves as risk management in a volatile market. The special connection with scoring and TLR token governance is allowing a relevant product to be created.
Pros And Cons Teller Protocol (TLR)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Allows uncollateralized and undercollateralized crypto loans | Currently has a smaller user and liquidity provider base than competitors |
| Supports both peer-to-peer and pool-to-peer lending models | Limited information on newer pools, making some less transparent |
| Enables users to create their own lending and borrowing markets | New protocol, so still developing user trust and ecosystem |
| Transparent and immutable loan books | Relatively new compared to established players like Aave |
| Provides multiple financial markets like NFTs and real estate loans | Limited adoption of advanced technologies like DECO and Chainlink, requiring further refinement |
18.Chainlink (LINK)
In 2025, Chainlink (LINK) will be at the center of the DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network) space providing vital decentralized oracle that can link smart contracts with the real world, essential for the development of any decentralized infrastructure based projects such as supply chains, energy grids and telecommunication systems among the systems.
With Chainlink’s expansive partnerships, new advancements like CCIP (Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol) and Proof of Reserve would further improve the scalability and reliability of DePIN initiatives, fostering a strong framework for the physical infrastructure on the blockchain
Pros And Cons Chainlink (LINK)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Provides decentralized oracles for blockchain data. | Oracle nodes can be costly to run. |
| Strong integration across various DeFi and smart contract platforms. | Requires a high level of technical expertise to set up. |
| Provides reliable, tamper-proof external data. | Decentralization can be difficult to maintain at scale. |
| Encourages adoption of blockchain ecosystems through its services. | Data throughput can be a bottleneck for heavy usage. |
| Continuous innovation and partnerships in the blockchain space. | May be difficult for smaller projects to integrate without additional costs. |
19.Celo (CELO)
Celo (CELO) seeks to propel the financial inclusion agenda by providing users with decentralized tools that are usable across mobile oriented services. Come 2025, the tetrad’s move into the DePIN space is expected to center around deploying advanced Pro-finance technologies based on diversified blockchain systems.
This will enable underbanked people around the world to access payment and lending services via mobile devices and other decentralized platforms
Pros And Cons Celo (CELO)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Mobile-first platform: Celo prioritizes mobile users, making it easy for people to send, spend, stake, and earn crypto on smartphones | Scalability challenges: Celo may struggle to scale its platform in a competitive market for mobile payments |
| Stablecoin integration: The Celo native stablecoins (CUSD, CEUR) are pegged to the US dollar and Euro, ensuring stability in payments | Focus on developing nations: Celo targets developing countries with less disposable income and internet connectivity, which could hinder mass adoption |
| EVM compatibility: Celo supports Ethereum-based decentralized applications (dApps), facilitating easy development and integration | Low liquidity: Limited market liquidity increases the risk of volatility and transaction delays |
20.Filebase (FBASE)
Filebase (FBASE) is expected to be among the top three decentralized storage solutions by 2025, establishing its place in the Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Network (DePIN) industry.
Filebase provides a functional click to save and click to upload and download file storage service that utilizes file storage protocols such as Filecoin and Sia.
It allows users to keep their data without the need for k centralized services, thus minimizing fees and enhancing privacy. With this expanding ecosystem, it seems that Filebase is going to facilitate even greater use of decentralized storage, thus making it one of the central areas of DePIN development in the future
Pros And Cons Filebase (FBASE)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Affordable pricing: Filebase offers low-cost storage with no additional fees | Dependence on Sia network: Filebase relies on the Sia network, which could have slower speeds compared to centralized cloud services |
| S3-compatible API: Easy integration with other decentralized services and platforms | Learning curve: Setting up decentralized storage solutions can be complex for new users |
| No upload or egress fees: Unlimited bandwidth without extra charges | Limited ecosystem: The platform’s ecosystem may not be as extensive as major cloud providers. |
How We Choose Best Depin Project In 2025
Use Case and Market Need: Start hunting for tangible solutions based projects, eg, enhancing internet access networks such as Helium, distributed energy such as Energy Web, or other storage models. They should also have a defined need and purpose.
Tokenomics: Consider the viability of the tokenomics model. Sound DePIN project will have optimal imbalance between supply and demand in a way that it fairly compensates the network users.
Community and Network Growth: A strong project is likely to have a large, active community which is trustworthy and interested in the project. Look for project activity, usage, and integrations.
Team and Partners: It is more advantageous when the businesses have qualified founders and advisors and have already forged some business relations with large corporations for better chances of business success.
Scalability: This is recurrent emphasis in terms of how an entity expands and meets the market demand. Search for DePINs that are endpoint populated in line with the technology.
Security: All DePINs are decentralized which necessitates high levels of security. Any project with superior security measures and limited vulnerability history will be more appealing.
Regulatory Compliance: Excessive risks can be solved by low-risk DePIN projects by meeting the demands of the legislation as the legislation on blockchain and decentralization gradually approaches.
Innovation and Roadmap: Ideal candidates would be those which are developing on novel propositions which are backed by solid long term business development plans.
Conclusion
New projects that have already started changing how the world works will be the best DePIN projects. Some of them include great products such as what Helium, Livepeer, and Filebase are currently doing.
It is decentralise a lot of devices such as IoT, see video content, and store files into the cloud. These projects dramatically cut costs and give users increased sovereignty through decentralised ownership and control, fostering the direction of the future decentralised internet.
